Use CasesAgentsInsights
Start
UPCOMING STUDY 2026

Dynamic Tariffs: What Energy Customers Really Think

Do customers want flexible prices or predictability above all? A qualitative study with 1,000+ participants on readiness, barriers, and trust in dynamic energy tariffs.

What the First Wave of Interviews Reveals

 

48%
have never heard of dynamic tariffs

Only 11% have a clear understanding. Another 41% know the term vaguely. The concept has not arrived with end customers.

70%
fear additional costs

Loss aversion dominates perception. Even respondents who clearly understand dynamic tariffs share this concern at 69%.

56%
prefer predictability

Safety beats opportunity. 33% prefer the chance of lower costs - and 82% of them want it without any conditions.

Dynamic Tariffs Are Coming. But Who Is Really Ready?

Only 5% of households actively use a dynamic electricity tariff today. But the structures behind them are changing rapidly - and those who think their business model from the world of 5% will react too late in 2035.

INFORMATION NEEDS
89%
do not know dynamic tariffs or only vaguely

The information strategy must separate two worlds: households with EVs, heat pumps, or PV systems seek savings potential and control. Everyone else needs orientation first - what is a dynamic tariff and what does it mean for daily life?

I've heard of it before, but I can't really explain it.
Awareness of dynamic tariffs
Never heard of it48%
Partial understanding41%
Clear understanding11%
Hands-on experience1%
ACCEPTANCE
70%
fear additional costs - only 11% are interested in savings

The majority is not won through price arguments, but through control, transparency, and simple automation. Anyone who only bets on savings alienates exactly the majority that will decide the market.

I would feel like I'm investing in stocks, and I have no interest in that.
What dominates perception?
Fear of additional costs70%
Balanced view12%
Interest in savings11%
Money not the focus7%

A First Look Into the Study

Some results confirm assumptions - the decisive ones contradict them.

48%
respondents

have never heard of dynamic tariffs

Only 11% have a clear understanding. 41% know the term vaguely but cannot explain it. The concept has not arrived with end customers.

70%
respondents

fear additional costs - not missed savings

Loss aversion dominates decision logic. Even informed respondents express this concern at 69% - information alone does not change risk perception.

82%
of opportunity-seekers

want the chance without protection mechanisms

Customers who prefer the chance of lower costs want it unconditionally. Only one in nine demands a price cap or guarantee. They buy when the product is available.

?%
predictability-preferrers

can be moved - but only via one specific protection mechanism

Which safety anchor activates the silent majority - and which arguments fail. The full study reveals the lever.

Only in the full study

Can Customers Actually Become Flexible?

We confronted participants with the scenario: 15-20% savings in exchange for accepting flexible consumption times. How do they react?

Flexibility range
Flexible9%
Conditionally flexible22%
Tied33%
Not identifiable36%
I don't need absolute predictability. The chance of lower costs is more important to me - I like taking such chances.
FLEXIBLE NOW · 9%
„The direct market is structurally limited“

8% see room to shift their consumption in time without notable restrictions. 33% see no way to shift, 36% deflect or only discuss price.

Maximum potential of a purely dynamic variant: 9%.

GROWTH SEGMENT · +22%
„Growth lies with the conditionally flexible“

22% already think in consumption windows - but only join in if the conditions are right: price caps, guaranteed savings windows, clear if-then logic.

Secured variant: 31% market. 3.4× larger than the direct market.

Two Sales Situations, Six Customer Types

The study identifies fundamentally different segments. Two are shown as a preview.

Predictability-Seekers
56%

Safety first. Switchable - but only with price cap or clear guarantees.

Opportunity-Takers
33%

Unconditionally ready to buy. No price cap, no guarantee needed - they buy when the product is there.

Segment 3
~?%

Full profile in the study.

In the full study
Segment 4
~?%

Full profile in the study.

In the full study
Segment 5
~?%

Full profile in the study.

In the full study
Segment 6
~?%

Full profile in the study.

In the full study

All segments with full profiles, drivers, and action recommendations are included in the full study.

What Really Drives Customer Attitudes

Six dimensions that determine whether dynamic tariffs succeed or fail in the market.

01

Tariff Priorities

Safety beats bargains. Customers prioritize predictability over the absolute lowest price – but which safety needs dominate in which segment?

02

Perception

Dynamic tariffs are known and partially negatively charged. Skepticism and diffuse risk associations dominate the first reaction. Which narratives work in which customer segments, which communication approaches build trust, and where does resistance arise.

03

Risk Perception vs. Savings

The fear of additional costs overshadows statistically provable savings. Loss aversion dominates decision logic. Volto AI makes these psychological patterns segment-specifically visible – so providers know whom to address how and when.

04

Acceptance Factors & Safety Anchors

Trust is not built through price, but through control mechanisms: price caps, transparency, clear if-then logic. Volto AI qualitatively captures which safety anchors actually work in which segments – and separates real drivers from assumptions.

05

Flexibility vs. Practicality

Flexibility is not an attitude question, but a capacity question. Household size, infrastructure, and time budget determine real usability. The connection of these structural characteristics with behavioral patterns shows which customer groups can actually be flexible – regardless of whether they want to.

06

Predictability vs. Opportunity

Risk willingness is not a personality trait, but tied to concrete conditions and life situations. Volto AI identifies the triggers and life events that turn a skeptical customer into an affine one – and turns this into a controllable sales signal.

What the Full Study Contains

No second-hand summaries. Real customer voices, structured analysis, action-oriented conclusions.

Segment-specific analysis of attitudes toward dynamic tariffs
Awareness levels and perception mapping across customer types
Emotional response patterns and psychological barriers
Trust requirements and safety anchor analysis
Trade-off acceptance by household context
Selected original customer quotes in their own words
Actionable recommendations for product and communication strategy

Qualitative at Scale

Using Volto's proprietary Qualitative at Scale methodology: AI-powered voice interviews with energy customers across Germany. Unfiltered opinions, deep analysis, quantitatively weighted.

01
Qualitative depth at quantitative scale
02
Unfiltered customer voices, no synthetic data
03
Segment-specific analysis
04
Interactive study with follow-up questions
STUDY DESIGN

Quoted voice-based online survey of 1,000 energy customers (electricity and gas) aged 18 to 75 in Germany, representatively weighted by age, gender, education, region, and household size/consumption. The surveys were conducted in February 2026.

Join the Waitlist

Be notified as soon as the study is available. No obligations.

Dynamic Tariffs: What Energy Customers Really Think
Q1 2026

Questions? Contact us at support@volto.ai

Agentic Customer Intelligence